How Tumblr Forces Advertisers to Get Creative
What the blog network’s monetization plans say about the future of
publishing.
Tumblr, sometimes unfairly shorthanded as the “hipster blogging service,” is now the ninth most visited site in the U.S. It’s a
favorite of mobile phone users–to wit, Tumblr has even put out a dedicated app
on Windows Phone 8, just
this week. And yet Tumblr still isn’t profitable, six
years in.
Should we dismiss Tumblr, then, as a form of vaporware? Often,
when founders say that profitability “just isn’t something we’re worried about
right now,” I tune out. I begin to wonder whether they’re at the helm of a
grand extracurricular project, a giant bubble waiting to burst.
But that’s not the case with Tumblr. Actually, Tumblr’s careful and
deliberate monetization of its site–much like BuzzFeed’s–is probably the future (or let’s say one future) of
advertising, and of content creation on the web more generally.
Tumblr recently allowed advertisers to feature content on its site. But
unlike Facebook, say, or the New York Times website,
Tumblr doesn’t rely on simple banner ads (founder David Karp is said to loathe
them). Rather, Tumblr is forcing advertisers to play the same game as Tumblr’s
own users. Advertisers have to create Tumblrs (pared-down blogs) of their own,
in effect; the content of those blogs can then be featured prominently through
the site. As Bloomberg put it last month: “Tumblr tells advertisers to come up
with campaigns that will spread through the network like its other content.”
For decades, in publishing, a firewall has existed between those who
sell the ads (the publishers), and those who write the content (editorial).
Speaking as someone who came up through editorial, the narrative for us has
always been one of fending off the publishers, of defending our editorial
freedom. The narrative was that editorial was under siege by the forces of
commerce.
Tumblr gives the lie to that way of viewing things. In another sense,
the forces of commerce have been under siege by editorial–by the people making
interesting content. Because the fact of the matter is, most people ignore the
banner, fast-forward on the DVR, or click to skip the YouTube ad; in fact,
there are whole YouTube
ads predicated on this joke. Editorial has won in a
sense: the idea that advertising, like editorial content, must be interesting, has won. You can’t just advertise
next to someone else’s Tumblr. You’ve got to create a Tumblr of your own.
I recently was speaking with a comedy writer who teaches a course in
sketch writing. She said that the unit on writing commercial parodies had
become the most difficult to teach, because so many ads today had become truly,
organically funny. In the early 90’s, it was easy to satirize the
straight-faced Tylenol PM ad, or the eerie cereal ad featuring an animated
rabbit. Nowadays, though, advertisements themselves are often very funny: the dating site Zoosk’s ads are
essentially commercial parodies in
and of themselves.
The editorial sensibility has won. Advertisers have to become content
creators, and Tumblr is riding that wave. “We’re not bringing them a template
or format to complete,” Lee Brown, Tumblr’s head of sales, told Bloomberg.
“We’re giving them a canvas. That takes a lot of time and a lot of thought.”
Ads now have to be engrossing, like good journalism. It’s unclear, now, just
which side that firewall between editorial and publishing was protecting.
E aí está: voltamos à nossa já velha conversa sobre o quanto a criação está ligada à coerção.
ResponderExcluirSobre novas configurações, eis uma proposta poética:
ResponderExcluirhttp://poesiadogoogle.com/